Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Maryland League of the South launches new website


The Maryland State Chapter of the League of the South launched a brand new website this past Monday that will reach many new prospective members and provide some basic information on what the Maryland League is all about. "The launch of the Maryland website, is yet another indicator of the growing momentum and viability of the League's message in the Old Line State!" said Maryland LS State Chairman Joyce Bennett.

The new website can be accessed by going to:  http://www.marylandls.org/index.php

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Come Home to Old Maryland Retreat


Be Our Guest at the
Come Home to Old Maryland Retreat
Saturday 11 June 2011
Noon to 4:00 PM [Or So]
Bushwood, Maryland

Our Program
Mini-Hedge Schools
[Two 45- Minute Presentations]

The Maryland Constitution
Reverend David Whitney
Institute on the Constitution Senior Instructor

The Origins of
Old Maryland and Virginia Speech
Pete Wigginton
Unreconstructed Philologist
Dinner at 12:30
Chaptico Market Fried Chicken, Greens, Potato Salad, Country Ham Biscuits, Dessert
We will supply tea and coffee. Folks can bring other beverages if they wish.

To register, email Joyce Bennett at jbennett@chesapeake.net or call 240-298-5281.

Registration required by 4 June. Directions will be sent to all who register.
Those coming from a distance are invited to stay overnight. There are limited lodging accommodations in the house. Camping on the lawn is an option too. Our meeting place is a gently restored historic home at the confluence of the Potomac and Wicomico Rivers in St. Mary's County. The house is not air conditioned. We will hold the hedge school sessions on the grounds and will be dining there as well , weather permitting. In case of rain, we will convene indoors.

The rebirth of the Free State

 
A renewed interest in small government at the northernmost end of Dixie

Contrary to the beliefs of some commentators on certain low-ratings national “news” agencies, the “Free State” didn’t earn its second nickname by being pro-Lincoln. Quite the contrary, Lincoln recieved less than 3,000 votes in the entire State, which voted for Breckinridge, and the nickname originated from a newspaper editor who called it so in response to Marylanders being called traitors for refusing to enforce prohibition at the State level. Yep that’s right folks, up until 35 years ago, Maryland was a reliable State’s rights zone. Today, so many Yankees have migrated to the central portion of Maryland that many don’t even identify with the rest of the State as “Southerners,” let alone hold a positive view of the League of the South or secession movements sponsored by other regions of the State. But despite multiple organisational setbacks, the Maryland Division League of the South has seen a recent boom in State-wide interest. Just two months into the year, the division has made appearances on radio, and been defended by various local newspapers. This year’s first meeting was held at the end of January in La Plata, MD. While there was much lament over the state of affairs in Montgomery county, a virtual cancerous extension of Washington, D.C., the major activist planning revolved around bumper stickers and supporting businesses that serve sweet tea and display proper manners. Both important to the preservation of our culture, but hardly means by themselves for the resurrection of a sovereignty movement.

When Thomas DiLorenzo, economics professor at Loyola University in Baltimore, was viciously attacked by a Missouri congressman for being tied to a “hate group,” a front page story in the Baltimore Sun raised many an eyebrow across the Old Line State. Even more shocking than the front page mention of the organisation, was the unbiased reporting normally lacking from the left-leaning news source. Members of the League of the South reported outsiders holding conversations about the article with positive reviews for the group and Ron Paul’s defense of it. For the first time in the history of the Maryland League, the League was publically on the offensive, and the detractors looked like the poverty pimps they are. Even Loyola University, which said it would certainly investigate any ties to “confirmed hate groups” by member professors, issued statements saying that the web site for the League of the South did not to their knowledge have anything hateful about race; in fact, the “free thinking” society called for an open debate and the issues the League claimed to represent were appropriate for discussion. Finally, consistency. The effect was that a large amount of Marylanders who had never before heard of the League were now introduced to it. Before they could be brainwashed into dismissing it as a hate group, such claims were already discounted. A barrier that often impedes even groups in the deep South was, at least temporarily, pushed aside. The time to advertise official positions of the Maryland League had come.
Most bills in Maryland have two facts in common. First, it’s all about the dollar in Annapolis. Second, if it’s a liberal bill, it is generally only supported in the D.C. metro area. The reason for this second observation is because while Maryland’s counties may be very conservative overall, over half of the residents live in the counties surrounding the Washington region. Case in point: Montgomery county. Just 50 years ago, the county was reliably conservative, and one of the largest businesses in the county was tobacco farming. Fast-forward 50 years later, and the amount of Yankee (mostly New England) transplants to Montgomery county alone has increased 2,600%. Yes, you read that right. For every Yankee living in the county 50 years ago, there resides 26 more today. And what could possibly draw so many Yankees to an area of Dixie that is well inland of the beaches and not exactly “endless summer” territory? Government jobs. And government workers almost always vote their paychecks. So not only did they bring their humanistic worldview, but their big-government voting paterns as well.

There are the areas such as northern Prince George’s county (also adjacent Washington, D.C.) and Baltimore City, which have a majority black population, historically democratic. But it is the gerrymandering that prevents a lot of these areas from being competitive politically. When a black man such as Charles Lollar, a conservative who proved he could hang out in the Confederate flag-waving bars of St. Mary’s county for a half hour and walk out with $5000 in donations just by showing who he really represented, can win three quarters of his district by county and lose because of an area stretching out 15 miles from Washington, thereby losing the election, it is hard to see any real change. The result of such politics is areas like Solomon’s Island, with it’s pleasant Southron people and even a welcome sign reading “Welcome Y’all,” being “represented” by “men” like Hoyer who have no respect for the South as a whole, let alone his own district.

The fact of the matter is, if the entire eastern shore of Maryland, one third of the State’s landmass, all of western Maryland, all of Southern Maryland, and even the central portions excluding those two counties by D.C. and the city of Baltimore votes reliably conservative on every issue, there is still usually a good chance they don’t get their way. The only logical solution is secession. Not only from the United States federal regime, but from the corrupt State government as well. Counties have pushed for it in the past. A decade ago, several eastern shore congressmen pushed for the secession of all 9 eastern shore counties. Just last year the commissioners of Frederick county in western MD considered a resolution to explore the ramifications of becoming their own State. But until now there has not been a unifying issue to push the eastern, southern and western portions to move on their threats together.

With the economy tanking and the stability of the entire federal empire on the brink, the state legislature in Annapolis has decided it is a good time to tackle two primary issues: changing the State’s law defining marriage, and raising the tax on fuel at a time when $5.00 regular unleaded is being threatened for 2011. While the world focuses on the liberals in Wisconsin complaining about what the government may no longer give them, Annapolis is getting jammed daily with truck drivers and protestors afoot, taking a stand against a fuel tax that could increase as much as 13% in an already overtaxed State. This act by the legislature only serves as an attention getter to those otherwise sleeping throughout the land, screaming the need for a more permanent solution. And of course, the Maryland League of the South is here with solutions, advertising in the local and city papers and weekly services. The other bill, redifining marriage to be, for all intents and purposes, between anyone other than a man and his goat, may not even make it to the governor. The House of Delegates, otherwise more liberal of the two chambers, wrestles with how to vote for a “law” that even much of their constituents in the D.C. area (many of whom are either black or Catholic) are opposed to. The Senate president has already vowed that if the law is signed, he will personally see to it that there is a referendum on the 2012 ballot. Should the law be passed, don’t expect the news media to report on the possibility of a referendum until just before the election next year. They know once it is given to the people, it doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in Miami. With this issue, the Maryland League of the South has even gained permission from some of the top talk radio stations in the State to run pro-traditional Southern values commercials during peak listening time. These commercials are running, and even advertise Dixienet.org and the Maryland League of the South by name.

The fight here, just below the Mason-Dixon line, is not so much one to prove our postion, as it is to unify the people under one banner against all overbearing government. In Maryland, we can take several examples. The first being just how corrupt a State government, even in the South, can become when enough outsiders with hostile views inhabit one area. It is a warning States like Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia should heed sooner, rather than later. But the second example is how fast a foothold can be gained when people decide they have been pushed too far.

It is time all Southrons stand up and decide they have reached this point. Some of us are worse off, and some of us have yet to have our lives altered by this beast. But we all must take a stand for the cause of our independence. The sun is setting on this day and rising on a new one. It’s too late to be apathetic. It’s never too late to stand for the truth.

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

2011 LS National Conference

~ CONFERENCE AGENDA~

Note: Both Online and Mail-In Registration Forms Are Provided At http://DixieNet.org.

Note: For location, and accommodation details please mash here


.
Thursday, 28 July
  • 8:00-9:30 p.m :: Annual League of the South Board of Directors Meeting, location TBA

Friday, 29 July
  • 8:00-9:00 a.m. :: Registration
  • 9:00-9:15 :: Welcome, Opening Prayer, and Entrance of Color Guard: MC Alex Cheek and TBA
  • 9:15-10:00 :: Speaker One - Pastor John Weaver: “When It Is Time”
  • 10:00-11:00 :: Workshop One - Mike Tubbs & Steve Walker: “Why Reforming the System Is Not Possible”
  • 11:00-11:30 :: Break and Musical Entertainment
  • 11:30-12:30 p.m. :: Workshop Two - Steve Kropelnicki, Esq.: “General Preparedness For A Societal Breakdown”
  • 12:30-2:00 :: Dinner (on your own)
  • 2:00-3:00 :: Workshop Three - Mike & Caleb Whorton: “How to Build and Maintain A Local League Chapter”
  • 3:00-3:30 :: LS Awards Ceremony: Alex Cheek and Michael Hill
  • 3:30-4:00 :: Break and Musical Entertainment
  • 4:00-5:00 :: Workshop Four - Franklin Sanders: “Building Community For Independence”
  • 5:00-5:10 :: Announcements and Closing Prayer: Alex Cheek and TBA
  • 5:10-7:30 :: Supper (on your own)
  • 7:30 until . . . :: An Evening of Southern Musical Entertainment


Saturday 30 July
  • 8:30-9:00 a.m. :: Registration
  • 9:00-9:15 :: Welcome, Opening Prayer, and Entrance of Color Guard: MC Alex Cheek and TBA
  • 9:15-10:15 :: Workshop Five - Mrs. Wade Rabun: “Stocking and Maintaining A Home Pantry”
  • 10:15-10:30 :: Break
  • 10:30-11:30 :: Workshop Six - Wade Rabun: “The Craft of Hunting & Tracking” 10:30-11:30
  • 11:30-1:00 p.m. :: Dinner (on your own)
  • 1:00-2:00 :: Workshop Seven - Dennis Blanton, Mike Crane, and David Jones: “Emergency Communications”
  • 2:00-2:15 :: Prize Presentations
  • 2:15-2:30 :: Break
  • 2:30-4:00 :: Workshop Eight - Pastor John Weaver and Ed Wolfe: “Basic Gun Safety and Maintenance”
  • 4:00-4:15 :: Break
  • 4:15-5:00 :: Speaker Two - Michael Hill: “What Would It Take To Get You To Fight?”
  • 5:00-5:10 :: Announcements and Closing Prayer: Alex Cheek and TBA
  • 5:10-5:15 :: Singing of Our National Anthem and Adjournment


Circle of St. Andrews Supper for LS Presidential Fund Contributors, time and place TBA.
Note To All State Chairmen: There will be no joint meeting of the Board and State Chairmen this year; instead, during the two-day conference, LS President Michael Hill will arrange to meet individually with each State Chairman (or his appointed delegate) to discuss matters pertaining to that particular State League chapter. These meetings will take place both during the conference breaks and in the evening on Friday. Each meeting should last no longer than 15-30 minutes.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

What is States’ Rights?

by Mike Crane

“Our Rights are like a cookie. No matter how big the cookie and how small the bites, eventually you run out of cookie.”
—Mike Crane
A very wise man, one for whom I have great respect, recently issued what seemed to be a challenge, “Was all y'all's talk about states' rights just whiskey talk, or do y'all really believe it?” Then he followed with, “If you do really believe it, then get liquored up and write an article!” 

So this POOR (Plain Ole Ordinary Redneck) mountain moron got to thinking about that. In my younger years it has been rumored by some that I got liquored up once or twice, but I can’t remember a thing about it. Some said that was the effect of the liquor. Now that I am kind of the opposite of a youngun, I can’t remember getting liquored up at all. Some say that isn’t the effect of liquor. Life is like that at times -- what was isn’t, and what is wasn’t. 

Of course, English majors will just go berserk over that last sentence; but it does apply to a discussion of States’ Rights in the year A.D. 2010, even if it is some of the poorest English grammar of the year. What was State’s Rights isn’t what it is today. What is States’ Rights today isn’t what it was.
To begin, I will put on my virtually unused and in brand new condition English grammar hat and point out that the apostrophe is in the wrong place. It should be State’s, not States.’ And the word Rights should be Powers. 

Why States’ vs. State’s? In the founding concept of American liberty, the primary purpose of government is to guarantee the rights of the people, which are derived from God. To accomplish this primary function of government, the power to govern was divided between a person’s State and The (several) States as a group (or the central government). States’ is the plural possessive. It references The States as a group and is thus the same as saying Federal Rights. So you could argue that people today who speak of States’ Rights have lost part of the basic concept before they even get started. 

Why Rights vs. Powers? The second word of the phrase is also misused. Rights are given to the people by God, not to their State, a group of States, or to a central government. States do not have rights; they have powers to govern that have been granted by the sovereign people. That, Ladies and Gentlemen, is the concept of American liberty. Government at every level is supposed to execute only those powers for which the people have granted the authority. Any debate that begins with the “Rights” of any government at any level has most likely been lost from the outset. Even if the effort seems to have initial success, in the end it only winds up chipping away at our God-given Rights. 

But for the sake of this article let’s just leave the above for consideration, thought, and prayer by the reader. Of those three, prayer should be the most important, giving thanks for the Rights that have been bestowed upon us by our Maker and asking forgiveness for being so complacent in giving His gifts away. 

From my perspective it is easy to identify what States’ Rights (or more accurately, State’s Powers) are not. States’ Rights are (is) not a slogan to be used to stop ObamaCare or Obama Cap and Tax or any other of the Obama socialist programs coming out of Washington City like a swarm of katydids. States’ Rights are (is) not a slogan to stop the Bush Patriot Acts or Bush CAFTA and other expensive trade agreements. By the same token, States’ Rights are (is) not a slogan to stop DFACS (Department of Children and Family Services) from illegal search and seizures, or some idiot in Atlanta telling me I do not have the proper permit to raise a duck unless the duck’s great grandmother’s owner had a proper permit! 

Now think about that last example. When someone says that States’ Rights will solve all of our problems, are they suggesting that it is proper to require a documented duck’s ancestry of suitable quality for a citizen to feed the duck and give it a home? Is such nonsense acceptable simply because it's being perpetrated by an idiot in Atlanta, Montgomery, Nashville or Columbia instead of an idiot in Washington City? A silly example, maybe. But once you concede Rights to any government entity you have lost that Right – most likely forever. Even worse is that your children and grandchildren will not even know that it is something that you lost and that they were denied! 

Today the debate should be about how State Powers will be used as a check on Federal Powers to guarantee our God-given Rights. It should be about how delegated Powers given to the Federal government will be used to guarantee our God-given Rights in areas that extend beyond the State in which we live. Otherwise, all of the rhetoric, all of the campaigning, and all the elected officials' use of today’s (improper) definition of States’ Rights will only determine how fast we go over the cliff. 

American liberty is rapidly approaching the cliff. It's up to you the citizen to change that direction if it's going to be changed. You have only this recourse at your disposal. Demand that all levels of government keep their hands off your God-given Rights unless the people grant them a Power to do so. Elect only those officials who are willing to abide by this restriction. Retire any elected official who abuses or usurps that which God has given you. 

Arguing about which level of government will do a better job abusing your God-given Rights makes for interesting partisan battles, but it's a formula for failure year after year, election after election, and decade after decade -- as we have seen. After all, those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it. In summary: what was State’s Rights isn’t what it is today. What is States’ Rights isn’t what it was. What your Rights will be is up to you.

What is States' Rights - Part 1
What is States' Rights - Part 2
What is States' Rights - Part 3
What is States' Rights - Part 4
What is States' Rights - Part 5
What is States' Rights - Part 6
What is States' Rights - Part 7

Mike Crane is a member of the League of the South Board of Directors and LS Communications Coordinator. Mike has a long track record as a hard worker within the Southern Heritage and Independence movements including being first chairman of the Florida League of the South, serving on the board of the Georgia League of the South, and an enthusiastic member of the Georgia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. Additionally, Crane is a Georgia Delegate to the Southern National Congress and serves as Chairman of the Internet Technology Committee for that organisation. Mike has been politically active since 1965. Within that time, he has run for the Georgia Senate twice and the Fannin County, Georgia Commission Chairmanship. Mike is also one of the principle founders of the Southern Party of Georgia.

Friday, May 27, 2011

Hog Heaven


by Joyce Bennett 
 
Not too many years ago in the county where I was born, summer morning mists would hang over acres and acres of tobacco, a crop we have been raising for almost four centuries. Today, however, because most of our farmers have taken a government buy-out, it is, sadly, a surprise to come across a field topping out along a back road in August. If there is anything I associate more with my country upbringing and Southern heritage than the gummy weed so despised by anti-smoking crusaders, it would have to be that other staple of Southern agriculture, the hog.
In years gone by even county people who were not farmers kept three or four of them, and every fall our hogs met their inevitable demise. By the time I was in junior high school, I was far too sophisticated --and deracinated-- to appreciate the rustic rituals of autumn, wishing with all my heart I had been born a city girl and not some hick who had to live on a tobacco farm and eat "hug" meat. 
 
But as a child, I had happily run barefoot up the path behind our house to the pen to watch my father feed the animals we raised each year. I enjoyed watching them eat and liked the mealy aroma of mash and water feed and how it coated their pretty pink snouts as they dipped them in the trough. I liked to scratch their backs and hear them grunt. I even liked the "smell" of the hogs themselves. Somehow it was not unpleasant to me. 
 
Daddy loved his hogs and hated killing them. To spare them suffering, he hired a highly-regarded black neighbor to shoot them before slitting their throats. In pork-pie hat and galluses, a cigar in his mouth, Spencer Barnes aimed his rifle at each beloved head dropping one after the other to the hard ground. The Pennsylvania Dutch, who had come to the county in the thirties, did not kill their hogs before bleeding them, and my brother saw an Amish farmer beat with a board one poor thing that had broken its leg and wasn't moving fast enough to the slaughter to suit him. But my people were gentle. 
 
To them hog killing was a big event. Family came to help; and also Agnes, the woman who had taken care of us children over the years and who was given to the telling of ancient and quite often gruesome tall tales. Until late into the night everyone sat around a large table in the kitchen cutting up the meat. It fell to my mother to prepare the country sausage, and she took great care in seasoning this delicacy, adding just the right amount of red pepper and sage and expertly twisting the plumped up casings into the links that would hang from tobacco sticks in the unctuous chill of a December meathouse. In the spring, we would take down from the rafters a moldy Easter ham and scrub it off, stuffing it with greens and onions and boiling it in a pillowcase for the holiday dinner. 
 
I am proud of such experiences and proud of my Southern agrarian roots-- now. Though I returned to the county from the North almost thirty years ago, as a young woman I was anxious to shake off the sandy soil of a Maryland tobacco farm and eventually married a Midwesterner, moving to exotic places such as Minnesota and Iowa. It was in Iowa one gray winter day when the snow lay in dishwater dingy piles, that I saw a semi rig hauling some hogs to market. My heart broke for them. Hogs should not be treated this way. They should live in a small pen and be loved by tender-hearted people who speak softly to them and scratch their backs and who kill them with mercy and respect for the sustenance they provide. 
 
But I have not turned into a militant vegetarian. No one loves country ham more than I do. I baste it in Jack Daniels. And I pride myself on my greens and fatback. As I grow older, however, I feel increasingly guilty about buying corporate meat, about buying that plastic tube of Old South-style sausage at the supermarket. Animal rights types are not necessarily wrong in calling attention to the miseries that most livestock endure before their final terrifying moments in a gigantic slaughter house. And right-wing radio talk show personalities might ridicule anyone who protests the plight of corporate farm animals, but, in truth, a little kindness towards the creatures over which God has given us dominion isn't left-wing or radical. It is simply Christian. 
 
Because most people today might not find it practical to keep hogs out back, buying meat on the hoof or meat products from a farmer we know and trust would seem a good alternative to supporting the big agricultural conglomerates. The totalitarians in DC, however, through increasingly complex regulation, threaten small farming operations, and the Southern National Congress has now called on the federal government to end its sponsorship of big agribusiness and to "restore the common law rights of farmers to sell at farm gate."
In first and foremost defending the Christian agrarian substrate of Southern society, we begin to frustrate the American Empire's plans to control even the most seemingly mundane aspects of our lives.
________________________________

Joyce Bennett is the Chairman of the Maryland League of the South and a Maryland Delegate to the Southern National Congress.

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Why Reform Is Impossible


Chapter 3 in The Grey Book; Blueprint for Southern Independence

1. The US Constitution, for all practical purposes, is irrelevant because it can mean anything a federal judge says it means.


2.The federal government is utterly unaccountable to the people, and no mechanism exists for checking it.


3. The ballot box has been compromised and no longer offers the prospect of meaningful change.


4. Even if the election process had not been compromised, no real choice exists as long as the two major parties are in control.


5. Third party ballot access is almost impossible to achieve and maintain.


6. Voters in large blocs, especially those who profit from the policies of the current regime--legal and illegal immigrants, Social Security recipients, minority interest groups, ad others who benefit from public spending--have a vested interest in preserving the status quo.


7. Major media outlets, the 'fourth branch of government,' control the flow of information and allow no real expression of dissent.


8. The people are afraid of losing their tenuous hold on prosperity and personal peace by 'rocking the boat.'


9. The USA PATRIOT Act and the Department of Homeland Security have undermined the Bill of Rights in the name of national security and provide the blueprint for a police state in teh US. Dissent is squelched through labelling it 'terrorism.'


10. Huge annual federal deficits and the accumulated national debt have mortgaged the wealth of future generations and will have to be repudiated.


11. The Left took the offensive at least fifty years ago and has held it, and the momentum, ever since.


12. Serious problems of scale exist. With only one representative in the House to approximately 618,000 citizens, the people would be justified in saying, 'No taxation without representation.